What are the main claims of the paper and how important are they?
This is a pure dialogue with few comments about the maximum systems...
Are these claims novel? If not, please specify papers that weaken the claims to the originality of this one.
No novelties
Are the claims properly placed in the context of the previous literature?
No
Do the results support the claims? If not, what other evidence is required?
There are no scientific results.
If a protocol is provided, for example for a randomized controlled trial, are there any important deviations from it? If so, have the authors explained adequately why the deviations occurred?
This is only a discussion
Is the methodology valid? Does the paper offer enough details of its methodology that its experiments or its analyses could be reproduced?
no
Would any other experiments or additional information improve the paper? How much better would the paper be if this extra work was done, and how difficult would such work be to do, or to provide?
no
Is this paper outstanding in its discipline? (For example, would you like to see this work presented in a seminar at your hospital or university? Do you feel these results need to be incorporated in your next general lecture on the subject?) If yes, what makes it outstanding? If not, why not?
no
Other Comments:
no other comments
Competing interests:
Invited by the author to review this article? : Yes
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?: No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:
H index 20, standardized experience in scientific papers
How to cite: Scicchitano P .“RUSH HOUR DRIVING NUTS: India-Based Anesthesiologist and America-Based Anesthesiologist Siblings Dialogue Series”[Review of the article 'RUSH HOUR DRIVING NUTS: India-Based Anesthesiologist and America-Based Anesthesiologist Siblings' Dialogue Series ' by Gupta D].WebmedCentral 2019;10(2):WMCRW003406
This is a pure dialogue with few comments about the maximum systems...
No novelties
No
There are no scientific results.
This is only a discussion
no
no
no
no other comments
Yes
No
None
H index 20, standardized experience in scientific papers